Sustainable development

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Sustainable development is defined as balancing the fulfillment of human needs with the protection of the natural environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but in the indefinite future. The linkage between environment and development was first made in 1980, when the International Union for the Conservation of Nature published the World Conservation Strategy and used the term "sustainable development."[1] The concept came into general usage following publication of the 1987 report of the Brundtland Commission — formally, the World Commission on Environment and Development. Set up by the United Nations General Assembly, the Brundtland Commission coined what was to become the most often-quoted definition of sustainable development as development that "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."[2]

The field of sustainable development can be conceptually broken into four constituent parts: environmental sustainability, economic sustainability, social sustainability and political sustainability.

Contents

  • 1 Scope and definitions
  • 2 Criticism of the term
  • 3 Environmental sustainability
  • 4 See also
  • 5 Notes and references
  • 6 External links and resources

[edit] Scope and definitions

Sustainable development does not focus solely on environmental issues. More broadly, sustainable development policies encompass three general policy areas: economic, environmental and social. In support of this, several United Nations texts, most recently the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, refer to the "interdependent and mutually reinforcing pillars" of sustainable development as economic development, social development, and environmental protection.

Scheme of sustainable development: at the confluence of three preoccupations.

The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO, 2001) elaborates further the concept by stating that "...cultural diversity is as necessary for humankind as biodiversity is for nature”; it becomes “one of the roots of development understood not simply in terms of economic growth, but also as a means to achieve a more satisfactory intellectual, emotional, moral and spiritual existence". In this vision, cultural diversity is the fourth policy area of sustainable development.

Green development is generally differentiated from Sustainable development in that Green development prioritizes what its proponents consider to be environmental sustainability over economic and cultural considerations. Proponents of Sustainable Development argue that it provides a context in which to improve overall sustainability where cutting edge Green development is unattainable. For example, a cutting edge treatment plant with extremely high maintenance costs may not be sustainable in regions of the world with less financial resources. An environmentally ideal plant that is shut down due to bankruptcy is obviously less sustainable than one that is maintainable by the indigenous community, even if it is somewhat less effective from an environmental standpoint.

Some research activities start from this definition to argue that the environment is a combination of nature and culture. The Network of Excellence "Sustainable Development in a Diverse World" SUS.DIV, sponsored by the European Union, works in this direction. It integrates multidisciplinary capacities and interprets cultural diversity as a key element of a new strategy for sustainable development.

The United Nations Division for Sustainable Development lists the following areas as coming within the scope of Sustainable Development:[3]

  • Agriculture
  • Atmosphere
  • Biodiversity
  • Biotechnology
  • Capacity-building
  • Climate Change
  • Consumption and Production Patterns
  • Demographics
  • Desertification and Drought
  • Disaster Reduction and Management
  • Education and Awareness
  • Energy
  • Finance
  • Forests
  • Fresh Water
  • Health
  • Human Settlements
  • Indicators
  • Industry
  • Information for Decision Making and Participation
  • Integrated Decision Making
  • International Law
  • International Cooperation for Enabling Environment
  • Institutional Arrangements
  • Land management
  • Major Groups
  • Mountains
  • National Sustainable Development Strategies
  • Oceans and Seas
  • Poverty
  • Sanitation
  • Science
  • Small Islands
  • Sustainable tourism
  • Technology
  • Toxic Chemicals
  • Trade and Environment
  • Transport
  • Waste (Hazardous)
  • Waste (Radioactive)
  • Waste (Solid)
  • Water

Sustainable Development is an ambiguous concept, as a wide array of views has fallen under its umbrella. The concept has included notions of weak sustainability, strong sustainability and deep ecology. Different conceptions also reveal a strong tension between ecocentrism and anthropocentrism. Thus, the concept remains weakly defined and contains a large amount of debate as to its precise definition.

During the last ten years, different organizations have tried to measure and monitor the proximity to what they consider sustainability by implementing what it has been called sustainability metric and indices.

Environmental technology
  • Air pollution control
  • Air pollution dispersion modeling
  • Alternative energy
  • Biofuel
  • Composting
  • Conservation biology
  • Conservation ethic
  • Ecoforestry
  • Energy conservation
  • Energy development
  • Environmental design
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Environmental preservation
  • Green building
  • Hydrogen technologies
  • Natural building
  • Recycling
  • Renewable energy
  • Renewable energy development
  • Remediation
  • Solid waste treatment
  • Sustainable architecture
  • Sustainable energy
  • Sustainable development
  • Waste water treatment
  • Water purification
  • Waste management
Environmental science


[edit] Criticism of the term

Many environmentalists have criticized some interpertations of the term "sustainable development" as an oxymoron, claiming that economic policies based on concepts of growth and continued depletion of resources cannot be sustainable, since that term implies resources remain constant. Some people prefer the term "developing sustainability", as it does not imply that something needs to be created.

[edit] Environmental sustainability

Further information: Environmental degradation

Environmental sustainability is defined as the ability of the environment to continue to function properly indefinitely. This involves meeting the present needs of humans without endangering the welfare of future generations. The goal of environmental sustainability is to minimize environmental degradation, and to halt and reverse the processes they lead to.

An "unsustainable situation" occurs when natural capital (the sum total of nature's resources) is used up faster than it can be replenished. Sustainability requires that human activity only uses nature's resources at a rate at which they can be replenished naturally. Theoretically, the long term result of environmental degradation would be local environments that are no longer able to sustain human populations to any degree. Such degradation on a global scale could imply extinction for humanity.

Consumption of renewable resources State of environment Sustainability
More than nature's ability to replenish Environmental degradation Not sustainable
Equal to nature's ability to replenish Environmental equilibrium Steady-state Sustainability
Less than nature's ability to replenish Environmental renewal Sustainable development